I’m a psychologist and I’ve worked as a consultant within Ohio’s Disability Determination Service (DDS) reviewing Social Security disability claims since the Fall of 2004. This blog post will be the first in an occasional series related to psychologists and disability (and the role of “disability psychologists” who consult on disability cases).
Besides being a treatment provider for someone who may apply for disability, there are two major roles for psychologists on Social Security disability claims. One is the consultative examiner (someone who performs a “CE” or psychological evaluation). I’ll discuss this more in a future blog post. The other role is a psychologist, psychiatrist or other physician who reviews medical records at one of the various levels of review (particularly the DDS). I’ll discuss the medical records review role in more detail in a future blog post as well.
The consulting psychologist or psychiatrist will complete the psychiatric review technique form and the mental residual functional capacity assessment form when necessary. The consultant may “meet a listing” in some circumstances and I’ll discuss this as well as these forms in a future blog post.
For this post I first wanted to put in a plug for “focusing on functioning.” Impairment is something we often fail to assess and document well as treatment providers. This will be the focus of more than one of my future posts. We” also talk about the mental “listings” in the future which is a separate way that someones’ social security disability claim may be granted.
However, first I want to call your attention to Social Security’s policy for mental limitations (POMS DI 25020.010 Mental Limitations).
If you are a treatment provider, someone providing psychological assessments related to disability or a medical records file review; it makes sense to be aware of Social Security’s policies related to what abilities are required for any job. It helps to keep a functional perspective related to these abilities. That way you can take steps to pay attention to factors relevant to those abilities and document those factors well. What does the policy say? Here goes:
DI 25020.010 Mental Limitations:
Mental limitations are generally considered to be nonexertional, but depression and conversion disorders may also limit exertion.
- It cannot be assumed that a failure to meet or equal one of the medical listings for mental impairments equates with the capacity to do at least unskilled work.
- If a medical listing is not met or equaled, the process must continue to consider whether the individual can meet the mental demands of PRW and, if not, whether he or she has the ability to adjust to other work considering his or her remaining mental and other functional capacities and vocational factors.
- The basic mental demands of competitive, remunerative, unskilled work include the abilities (on a sustained basis) to:
- understand, carry out, and remember simple instructions;
- make judgments that are commensurate with the functions of unskilled work, i.e., simple work-related decisions.
- respond appropriately to supervision, coworkers and work situations; and
- deal with changes in a routine worksetting.
- A substantial loss of ability to meet any of the basic mental demands listed in A.3.a. above.
- severely limits the potential occupational base and thus,
- would justify a finding of inability to perform other work even for persons with favorable age, education and work experience.
NOTE: “Substantial loss” cannot be precisely defined. It does not necessarily relate to any particular adjective, number, or percentage. In practical terms, an individual has a substantial loss of ability to perform a basic mental activity when he or she cannot perform the particular activity in regular, competitive employment but, at best, could do so only in a sheltered work setting where special considerations and attention are provided. This requires professional judgment, on the basis of the evidence in file in each case. The impairment in a claim of this type may meet or equal the listed medical criteria. Therefore, before making a determination that includes vocational evaluation, the adjudicator should discuss the case with a psychiatrist or psychologist to learn whether a significant part of the evidence had been previously overlooked or underrated.
- A person who can meet all of the mental demands listed in “DI 25020.010A.3.a.” and has only a mental limitation(s) will almost always be capable of adjusting to other work since his or her potential occupational base would be the unskilled jobs at all exertional levels.
EXCEPTION: In a few rare instances where a person’s vocational profile is extremely adverse (e.g., closely approaching retirement age, limited education or less, and essentially a lifetime commitment to a field of unskilled work that is now precluded by a mental impairment), a finding of “disabled” may be appropriate. (This would be adjudicated under the Lifetime Commitments Special Medical-Vocational Profile. See DI 25010.001B.3.).
- the basic mental demands of work listed in DI 25020.010A.3.a. and
- the ability to perform work at various exertional levels and for specific jobs.
NOTE: The purpose of section I (“Summary Conclusion”) on the SSA-4734-F-SUP is chiefly to have a worksheet to ensure that the psychiatrist or psychologist has considered each of these pertinent mental activities and the claimant’s or beneficiary’s degree of limitation for sustaining these activities over a normal workday and workweek on an ongoing, appropriate, and independent basis. It is the narrative written by the psychiatrist or psychologist in section III (“Functional Capacity Assessment”) of form SSA-4734-F4-Sup that adjudicators are to use as the assessment of RFC. Adjudicators must take the RFC assessment in section III and decide what significance the elements discussed in this RFC assessment have in terms of the person’s ability to meet the mental demands of past work or other work. This must be done carefully using the adjudicator’s informed professional judgment.
- The ability to remember locations and worklike procedures.
- The ability to understand and remember very short and simple instructions.
- The ability to carry out very short and simple instructions.
- The ability to maintain concentration and attention for extended periods (the approximately 2-hour segments between arrival and first break, lunch, second break, and departure).
- The ability to perform activities within a schedule, maintain regular attendance, and be punctual within customary tolerances.
- The ability to sustain an ordinary routine without special supervision.
- The ability to work in coordination with or proximity to others without being (unduly) distracted by them.
- The ability to complete a normal workday and workweek without interruptions from psychologically based symptoms and to perform at a consistent pace without an unreasonable number and length of rest periods.
- The ability to make simple work-related decisions.
- The ability to be aware of normal hazards and take appropriate precautions.
- The ability to ask simple questions or request assistance.
- The ability to accept instructions and respond appropriately to criticism from supervisors.
- The ability to get along with coworkers or peers without (unduly) distracting them or exhibiting behavioral extremes.
d. Dealing with changes in a routine worksetting — the ability to respond appropriately to changes in (a routine) work setting.
The claimant/beneficiary must show the ability to:
- remember work-like procedures (locations are not critical).
- understand and remember very short and simple instructions.
- carry out very short and simple instructions.
- maintain attention for extended periods of 2-hour segments (concentration is not critical).
- maintain regular attendance and be punctual within customary tolerances. (These tolerances are usually strict.) Maintaining a schedule is not critical.
- sustain an ordinary routine without special supervision.
- work in coordination with or proximity to others without being (unduly) distracted by them.
- make simple work-related decisions.
- complete a normal workday and workweek without interruptions from psychologically based symptoms and perform at a consistent pace without an unreasonable number and length of rest periods. (These requirements are usually strict.)
- ask simple questions or request assistance.
- accept instructions and respond appropriately to criticism from supervisors.
- get along with coworkers or peers without (unduly) distracting them or exhibiting behavioral extremes.
- respond appropriately to changes in a (routine) work setting.
- be aware of normal hazards and take appropriate precautions.
- The basic abilities listed in “DI 25020.010B.2.” (i.e., the “abilities needed to perform any job” ) are necessary.
- Often, there is an increasing requirement for understandingand memoryand forconcentrationand persistence , e.g.: the ability to:
- understand and remember detailed instructions,
- carry out detailed instructions, and
- set realistic goals or make plans independently of others.
- Other special abilities may be needed depending upon the type of work and specific functions it involves.
Different jobs require different degrees of mental ability.
EXAMPLE 1: Most competitive jobs require the ability to meet basic standards of neatness and cleanliness. However, the standards that must be met vary greatly depending upon whether the job(s) being considered involve dealing with the public; or working in a factory, a coal mine, a stock yard, etc.
EXAMPLE 2: Most competitive jobs require the ability to travel to and from work and thus, would be precluded by extreme agoraphobia in which the person is incapable of leaving his or her home. However, a mild case of agoraphobia may not preclude the ability to travel to and from work or preclude work performed in the same (and thus, familiar) setting each day.
–END of QUOTED MATERIAL FROM THE SSA–
FINAL NOTES: Thanks again, if you haven’t already please subscribe to the blog so you can get new posts, including future ones related to disability, emailed right to your inbox. I am also a medical records review consultant on disability cases for private disability insurance companies. I will occasionally be blogging about those experiences too. If you haven’t seen it yet I’m selling a preorder deal for a new publication which includes me shipping you an early draft of a referral source list which includes over 70 referral sources, including lots of companies that psychologists can do medical records reviews for from the comfort of their own home or office. You can see that deal on the website at http://www.psychology.news
If you have questions please email me at email@example.com